Big Data Analysis-Based Secure Cluster Management for Optimized Control Plane in Software-Defined Networks

Abstract:

In software-defined networks (SDNs), the abstracted control plane is its symbolic characteristic, whose core component is the software-based controller. The control plane is logically centralized, but the controllers can be physically distributed and composed of multiple nodes. To meet the service management requirements of large-scale network scenarios, the control plane is usually implemented in the form of distributed controller clusters. Cluster management technology monitors all types of events and must maintain a consistent global network status, which usually leads to big data in SDNs. Simultaneously, the cluster security is an open issue because of the programmable and dynamic features of SDNs. To address the above challenges, this paper proposes a big data analysis-based secure cluster management architecture for the optimized control plane. A security authentication scheme is proposed for cluster management. Moreover, we propose an ant colony optimization approach that enables big data analysis scheme and the implementation system that optimizes the control plane. Simulations and comparisons show the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed scheme. The proposed scheme is significant in improving the security and efficiency SDN control plane.

Existing System:

First, a larger SDN network must to be divided into several smaller network domains. Each controller node is responsible for managing a network domain, the adjacent domain controllers need to able to communicate with each other to update the global network state and execute the global strategy. Second, cluster controllers consisting of multiple controllers are needed. Meanwhile, when controllers cooperate with each other, it is possible avoid single controller node failures, communication failures and other kinds of accidental network failures, which enhances the network stability. It is highly important to divide the network, and to define the communication rules between the controllers. These problems have become frequent topics in the research on SDN cluster control technology [18], [19].

Proposed System:

A big data analysis-based secure cluster management architecture for optimized control plane. A secure authentication scheme was proposed to ensure the legality of the data sources. Next, ant colony optimization was used to enable a big data analysis scheme and an implementation system was proposed to optimize the control plane. This work is significant in improving the performance and efficiency of applications running in SDN. In future work, a distributed security data storage scheme for the SDN controller cluster will be proposed.

CONCLUSION:

In large-scale SDN, multiple controllers in the control plane must be able to collaborate to manage the entire network. Control plane extensibility is an important issue. Clustering is a feasible and proven approach to achieve efficient SDN management, in which the cluster monitors all types of events and maintain a consistent global network status. This usually involves big data in SDN. At the same time, the legality of the data sources should be ensured, thus the big data for cluster must be trustworthy. To address the above challenges, this paper proposed a big data analysis-based secure cluster management architecture for optimized control plane. A secure authentication scheme was proposed to ensure the legality of the data sources. Next, ant colony optimization was used to enable a big data analysis scheme and an implementation system was proposed to optimize the control plane. This work is significant in improving the performance and efficiency of applications running in SDN. In future work, a distributed security data storage scheme for the SDN controller cluster will be proposed.

REFERENCES:

[1] A. Blenk, A. Basta, M. Reisslein, and W. Kellerer, “Survey on network virtualization hypervisors for software defined networking,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 655–685, 1st Quart., 2016.

[2] S. Scott-Hayward, S. Natarajan, and S. Sezer, “A survey of security in software defined networks,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 623–654, 1st Quart., 2016.

[3] G. Li et al., “Deep packet inspection based application-aware traffic control for software defined networks,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Washington, DC, USA, 2016, pp. 1–6.

[4] W. Han et al., “SD-OPTS: Software-defined on-path time synchronization for information-centric smart grid,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Commun. Conf. (IEEE GLOBECOM), 2017, pp. 1–6.

[5] L. Cui, F. R. Yu, and Q. Yan, “When big data meets software-defined networking: SDN for big data and big data for SDN,” IEEE Netw., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 58–65, Jan./Feb. 2016.

[6] L. Kuang, L. T. Yang, X. Wang, P. Wang, and Y. Zhao, “A tensor-based big data model for QoS improvement in software defined networks,” IEEE Netw., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 30–35, Jan./Feb. 2016.

[7] Z. Jiao, H. Ding, M. Dang, R. Tian, and B. Zhang, “Predictive big data collection in vehicular networks: A software defined networking based approach,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Washington, DC, USA, 2016, pp. 1–6.

[8] H. Li, M. , and K. Ota, “Control plane optimization in softwaredefined vehicular ad hoc networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 7895–7904, Oct. 2016.

[9] Y. Fu et al., “A hybrid hierarchical control plane for flow-based largescale software-defined networks,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 117–131, Jun. 2015.

[10] M. Ambrosin, M. Conti, F. D. Gaspari, and R. Poovendran, “LineSwitch: Tackling control plane saturation attacks in softwaredefined networking,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1206–1219, Apr. 2017.

[11] S. Luo, M. , K. Ota, J. Wu, and J. Li, “A security assessment mechanism for software-defined networking-based mobile networks,” Sensors, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 31843–31858, 2015.

[12] S. Song, H. Park, B.-Y. Choi, T. Choi, and H. Zhu, “Control path management framework for enhancing software-defined network (SDN) reliability,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 302–316, Jun. 2017.

[13] Y. Fu et al., “A hybrid hierarchical control plane for flow-based largescale software-defined networks,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 117–131, Jun. 2015.

[14] S. Zhao and D. Medhi, “Application-aware network design for hadoop mapreduce optimization using software-defined networking,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 804–816, Dec. 2017.

[15] X. Lyu, H. Tian, W. Ni, R. P. Liu, and P. Zhang, “Adaptive centralized clustering framework for software-defined ultra-dense wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 8553–8557, Sep. 2017.

[16] A. S. Muqaddas, A. Bianco, P. Giaccone, and G. Maier, “Inter-controller traffic in ONOS clusters for SDN networks,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), 2016, pp. 1–6.

[17] R. Macedo, R. de Castro, A. Santos, Y. Ghamri-Doudane, and M. Nogueira, “Self-organized SDN controller cluster conformations against DDoS attacks effects,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Washington, DC, USA, 2016, pp. 1–6.

[18] R. Xie, Z. Umair, and X. Jia, “A wireless solution for SDN (software defined networking) in data center networks,” in Proc. IEEE Glob. Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Washington, DC, USA, 2016, pp. 1–6.

[19] J. Al-Jaroodi, N. Mohamed, H. Jiang, and D. Swanson, “Middleware infrastructure for parallel and distributed programming models in heterogeneous systems,” IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1100–1111, Nov. 2016.

[20] B. Lin et al., “A pretreatment workflow scheduling approach for big data applications in multicloud environments,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 581–594, Sep. 2016.